New gTLD Program Applicant Guidebook Banner

List of Figures and Tables

Tables

Table V-1: Applicant Guidebook Version History

Table 1-1: Evaluations Subject to Extended Evaluation

Table 1-2: Evaluations that Qualify for Challenge

Table 1-3: Estimated Duration of Each Process

Table 1-4: Estimated Duration of Some Conditional Processes

Table 3-1: Overview of Application Types and Key Differences in Handling

Table 3-2: Conditional Evaluations and Fees

Table 3-3: Application Change Request Types and Required Processes

Table 4-1: Objections and Appeals Definitions

Table 4-2: Overview of the Objection Grounds, Parties with Standing, and Outcomes

Table 5-1: Criterion 1 - Organization

Table 5-2: Criterion 1 - Engagement

Table 5-3: Criterion 1 - Awareness

Table 5-4: Criterion 1 - Established Presence

Table 5-5: Criterion 1 - Longevity

Table 5-6: Criterion 2 - Nexus

Table 5-7: Criterion 3 - Eligibility

Table 5-8: Criterion 3 - Name Selection

Table 5-9: Criterion 4 - Community Endorsement

Table 5-10: Phased-out Bid Credit for Supported Applicants for Winning Bids >5 Million USD

Table 6-1: Overview of Financial Evaluation Requirements by Profile Type

Table 7-1: ICANN, IANA, and IETF-Related Bodies and Internet Infrastructure

Table 7-2: Safeguard PICs Framework

Table 7-2: Types of Safeguard PICs

Table 7-3: RVC Evaluation Criteria

Table 7-4: Scope of Comparisons Performed by the String Similarity Evaluation Panel

Table 7-5: Outcomes for the gTLD Application Due to the String Similarity Evaluation Performed by the Panel

Table A1-1 Application Question Sets and Descriptions

Table A2-1: Separable Country and Territory Names List

Table A5-1: Most Likely Scenario Financial Projection

Table A5-2: Most Likely Scenario Financial Projection - SAMPLE

Table A5-3: Worst Case Scenario Financial Projection

Table A5-4: Worst Case Scenario Financial Projection - SAMPLE

Table A5-5: Risk Assessment Template

Table A5-6: Registration Projections Template

Table G1: Glossary

Figures

Figure 1-1: Process Overview

Figure 3-1: Application Change Requests: Workflow 1

Figure 3-2: Application Change Requests: Workflow 2

Figure 4-1: Application Comment Forum Submission

Figure 5-1: Contention Set Resolution Process

Figure 5-2: Direct and Indirect Contention Set Overview

Figure 5-3: Example of Indirect Contention Set Resolution

Figure A1-1 Application Question Sets Flow in TAMS

Figure A3-1: Objections Timeline (in days)

Figure A3-2: Appeals Timeline (in days)

Figure A6-1: Change Execution Flowchart 1

Figure A6-2: Change Execution Flowchart 2